Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M and 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
48 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 3000M
0.432 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4800 +6%
0.462 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
625 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
5
SM Count
24
240
Shading Units
192
40
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
18.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
432.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
36.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GF104
GPU Name
GT200B
N12E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy