Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI50

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI50

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M and 16GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI50 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI50 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1746MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1020GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
3600 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 3000M
0.432 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI50 +3004%
13.41 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
Nov 2018
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1746 MHz
625 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
1020GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
60
5
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
3840
40
TMUs
240
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
111.7 GPixel/s
18.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
419.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.82 TFLOPS
432.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.41 TFLOPS
36.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.705 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF104
GPU Name
Vega 20
N12E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
Vega 20 GLXT
Fermi
Architecture
GCN 5.1
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
13.23 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
331 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy