Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs AMD Radeon PRO W7800

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs AMD Radeon PRO W7800

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M and 32GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 260W)
AMD Radeon PRO W7800 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2499MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
4240 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 3000M
0.432 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7800 +10265%
44.78 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
Apr 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1855 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2499 MHz
625 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
70
5
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
4480
40
TMUs
280
32
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
70
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB

Theoretical Performance

4.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
319.9 GPixel/s
18.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
699.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
89.56 TFLOPS
432.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.78 TFLOPS
36.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1399 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
260W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF104
GPU Name
Navi 31
N12E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 31
Fermi
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy