Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M and 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (280.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
5904 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 3000M
0.432 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation +4337%
19.17 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
Mar 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ada
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
720 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
625 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
160bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
280.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
5
SM Count
48
240
Shading Units
6144
40
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
124.8 GPixel/s
18.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
299.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
19.17 TFLOPS
432.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.17 TFLOPS
36.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
299.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
70W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF104
GPU Name
AD104
N12E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy