Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4

NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 and 4GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 4 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 260W)
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 's Advantages
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
4560 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 4 +11807%
12.86 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
770 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
12.32GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
6
SM Count
72
48
Shading Units
4608
16
TMUs
288
8
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
133.9 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
401.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
25.71 TFLOPS
108.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.86 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
401.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
260W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
TU102
GT216 GL
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy