CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X
NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X
VS
NVIDIA Quadro 400
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
14032 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI250X
+44224%
47.87 TFLOPS
Quadro 400
VS
Radeon Instinct MI250X
Graphics Card
Apr 2011
Release Date
Nov 2021
Quadro
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
770 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
128GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
12.32GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s
Render Config
6
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
220
48
Shading Units
14080
16
TMUs
880
8
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
383.0 TFLOPS
108.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.87 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
47.87 TFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
Aldebaran
GT216 GL
GPU Variant
Aldebaran XT
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Board Design
32W
TDP
500W
200 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
N/A
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro 400
2
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Quadro 400
3
NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Tesla K40c
4
NVIDIA Quadro 410 vs NVIDIA Quadro 400
5
NVIDIA Quadro K6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 400
6
NVIDIA Tesla T4 vs NVIDIA Quadro 400
7
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA Quadro K620M
8
NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
9
NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA GRID K520Q
10
NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA GRID M60 8Q
Related News
1
AMD's Latest Breakthrough Technology Could Change the Game in the Future
2
Researchers Utilize NVIDIA Omniverse Platform to Analyze and Improve 3D Stacked Chip Designs
3
TSMC to Receive Over 60 EUV Lithography Machines Over the Next Two Years, Investing More Than $12.3 Billion
4
Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time
5
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
6
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
7
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
8
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
9
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
10
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy