Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700

NVIDIA Quadro 4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 4000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.86GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
224 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 142W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 4000 +723%
0.486 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2010
Release Date
Sep 2007
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
702 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
89.86GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
4
256
Shading Units
32
32
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.680 GPixel/s
15.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.360 GTexel/s
-
-
-
486.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
58.88 GFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

142W
TDP
42W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
G84
GF100-825-A3
GPU Variant
G84-875-A2
Fermi
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy