Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

NVIDIA Quadro 4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 4000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.86GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
224 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 142W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 4000 +390%
0.486 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700M
0.099 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2010
Release Date
Oct 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
702 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
89.86GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
4
256
Shading Units
32
32
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
15.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
486.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
99.20 GFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

142W
TDP
50W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
G96
GF100-825-A3
GPU Variant
NB9P-GLM
Fermi
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy