NVIDIA Quadro 410 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 410 and 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 410 's Advantages
Lower TDP (38W vs 150W)
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 14.26GB/s)
3904 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 410
0.271 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+6095%
16.79 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2012
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1950 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
891 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.26GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
192
Shading Units
4096
16
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
32
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.824 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
262.4 GPixel/s
11.30 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
524.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
33.59 TFLOPS
271.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.79 TFLOPS
11.30 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
38W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
DG2-512
GK107-810-A2
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
