Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 600 vs Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem

NVIDIA Quadro 600 vs Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 600 and 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 2400W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
16288 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 600
0.246 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem +21213%
52.43 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2010
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1565 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
128GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
3205GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
16384
16
TMUs
1024
8
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1024
-
RT Cores
128
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
408 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.560 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
10.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1638 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
52.43 TFLOPS
245.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.43 TFLOPS
20.48 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.43 TFLOPS

Board Design

40W
TDP
2400W
200 W
Suggested PSU
2800 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

GF108
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
-
-
-
Fermi
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
40 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
100 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy