Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 600 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition

NVIDIA Quadro 600 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 600 and 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 600 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Lower TDP (40W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition 's Advantages
More VRAM (1536GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
96 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 600
0.246 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition +87%
0.462 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2010
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1536MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
24
96
Shading Units
192
16
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.560 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
10.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
245.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
20.48 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS

Board Design

40W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GF108
GPU Name
GT200B
-
-
-
Fermi
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy