Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 600 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

NVIDIA Quadro 600 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 600 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 51W)
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
288 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 600
0.246 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000 +197%
0.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2010
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
384
16
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.560 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
10.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
245.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
20.48 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS

Board Design

40W
TDP
51W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF108
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.1
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy