Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition

NVIDIA Quadro 6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro 6000 and 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 6000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (143.4GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 204W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 6000 +122%
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
0.462 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2010
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
747 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
143.4GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
24
448
Shading Units
192
56
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS

Board Design

204W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
GT200B
GF100-850-A3
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy