Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 6000 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7800

NVIDIA Quadro 6000 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7800

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro 6000 and 32GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 6000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (204W vs 260W)
AMD Radeon PRO W7800 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2499MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 143.4GB/s)
4032 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 6000
1.028 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7800 +4256%
44.78 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2010
Release Date
Apr 2023
Quadro
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1855 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2499 MHz
747 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
143.4GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
70
14
SM Count
-
448
Shading Units
4480
56
TMUs
280
48
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
70
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
768 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
319.9 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
699.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
89.56 TFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.78 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1399 GFLOPS

Board Design

204W
TDP
260W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
Navi 31
GF100-850-A3
GPU Variant
Navi 31
Fermi
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy