CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
Intel Arctic Sound 2T
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
7648 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T
+17175%
13.82 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1600M
VS
Arctic Sound 2T
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
7680
16
TMUs
240
8
ROPs
120
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G84
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
NB8P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
80 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
8 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q
2
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
3
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800
4
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro Plex 1000 Model II
5
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs Intel Arctic Sound-M
6
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200
7
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000
8
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
9
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile
10
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Tesla D870
Related News
1
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
2
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
3
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
4
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
5
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
6
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
7
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
8
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
9
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
10
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy