Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 62W)
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (41.60GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
160 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000 +500%
0.48 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Dec 2010
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
41.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
4
32
Shading Units
192
16
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
40.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
62W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GF106
NB8P-GLM
GPU Variant
GF106-875-KA-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
2.1
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy