CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M and 4GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 4 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 260W)
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 's Advantages
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
4576 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 4
+15975%
12.86 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1600M
VS
GRID RTX T10 4
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
72
32
Shading Units
4608
16
TMUs
288
8
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
133.9 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
401.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
25.71 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.86 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
401.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
260W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G84
GPU Name
TU102
NB8P-GLM
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile
2
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB
3
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000 SDI
4
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Tesla T40 24 GB
5
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile
6
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
7
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
8
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
9
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
10
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Mobile
Related News
1
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
2
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
3
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
4
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
5
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
6
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
7
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
8
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
9
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
10
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy