Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M and 4GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 4 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 260W)
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 's Advantages
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
4576 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 4 +15975%
12.86 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
72
32
Shading Units
4608
16
TMUs
288
8
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
133.9 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
401.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
25.71 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.86 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
401.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
260W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
TU102
NB8P-GLM
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy