Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 65W)
NVIDIA Quadro K2200M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
608 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
Quadro K2200M +967%
0.854 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
640
16
TMUs
40
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.67 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.68 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
853.8 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
26.68 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
65W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GM107
NB8P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
5.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy