Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M and 8GB VRAM Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.29GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
992 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (15W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB +1500%
1.28 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Mar 2023
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Tegra
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1067 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
LPDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
68.29GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
8
32
Shading Units
1024
16
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
32
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.560 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1280 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
640.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
15W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GA10B
NB8P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
80 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
Unknown
169 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy