Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (25.60GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
16 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1600M +175%
0.08 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Oct 2007
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
2
32
Shading Units
16
16
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.836 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.672 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.38 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
21W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DMS-59
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
G86
NB8P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy