Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA GRID M3 3020

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA GRID M3 3020

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M and 4GB VRAM GRID M3 3020 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID M3 3020 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1306MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (83.20GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
608 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
GRID M3 3020 +1990%
1.672 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
May 2016
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1033 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1306 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
83.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
640
16
TMUs
40
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.90 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
52.24 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.672 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
52.24 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GM107
NB8P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
5.0
4.0
Shader Model
6.7 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy