Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile 12 GB

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile 12 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M and 12GB VRAM RTX A3000 Mobile 12 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 130W)
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile 12 GB 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
4064 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
RTX A3000 Mobile 12 GB +14650%
11.8 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
855 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1440 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
32
32
Shading Units
4096
16
TMUs
128
8
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
32
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
92.16 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
184.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
11.80 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.80 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
184.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
130W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GA104
NB8P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
80 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy