Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Tesla P10

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Tesla P10

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M and 24GB VRAM Tesla P10 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla P10 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1493MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (694.3GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
3808 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
Tesla P10 +14237%
11.47 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Sep 2016
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1025 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1493 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1808 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5X
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
694.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
30
32
Shading Units
3840
16
TMUs
240
8
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
143.3 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
358.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
179.2 GFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.47 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
358.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GP102
NB8P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy