CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA GRID K520Q
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA GRID K520Q
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
NVIDIA GRID K520Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 and 4GB VRAM GRID K520Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K520Q 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1504 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
GRID K520Q
+3779%
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700
VS
GRID K520Q
Graphics Card
Sep 2007
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro FX
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
4
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
32
Shading Units
1536
16
TMUs
128
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
3.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
7.360 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
58.88 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
G84
GPU Name
GK104
G84-875-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Board Design
42W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
2
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
3
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP
4
NVIDIA Quadro M6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
5
NVIDIA Tesla K80 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
6
NVIDIA Quadro P520 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
7
NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2100 D4 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
8
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000
9
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
10
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy