Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1600M +35%
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2007
Release Date
Jun 2007
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

4
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
32
Shading Units
32
16
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

3.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
7.360 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
58.88 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
G84
G84-875-A2
GPU Variant
NB8P-GLM
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Board Design

42W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy