Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA Quadro K620

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA Quadro K620

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K620 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 45W)
NVIDIA Quadro K620 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
352 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
Quadro K620 +1362%
0.863 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2007
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1058 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
384
16
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
7.360 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.98 GTexel/s
-
-
-
58.88 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
863.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
26.98 GFLOPS

Board Design

42W
TDP
45W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GM107
G84-875-A2
GPU Variant
GM107-850-A2
Tesla
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
5.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy