Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 and 4GB VRAM Quadro P1000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 47W)
NVIDIA Quadro P1000 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
608 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
Quadro P1000 +3110%
1.894 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2007
Release Date
Feb 2017
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1266 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
5
32
Shading Units
640
16
TMUs
40
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
47.36 GPixel/s
7.360 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.60 GFLOPS
58.88 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
59.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

42W
TDP
47W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GP107
G84-875-A2
GPU Variant
GP107-860-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
80 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy