Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA Tesla M6

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA Tesla M6

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 and 8GB VRAM Tesla M6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Tesla M6 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1180MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1504 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
Tesla M6 +6044%
3.625 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2007
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro FX
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1180 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
1536
16
TMUs
96
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.52 GPixel/s
7.360 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
113.3 GTexel/s
-
-
-
58.88 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.625 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
113.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

42W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GM204
G84-875-A2
GPU Variant
GM204-995-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
5.2
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy