Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs NVIDIA GRID K160Q

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs NVIDIA GRID K160Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700M and 1024MB VRAM GRID K160Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 130W)
NVIDIA GRID K160Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.51GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
160 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700M
0.099 TFLOPS
GRID K160Q +229%
0.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2008
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
192
16
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
99.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
130W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

G96
GPU Name
GK107
NB9P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy