Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700M and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 55W)
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
352 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700M
0.099 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000M +477%
0.572 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2008
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-II
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
384
16
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.960 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.84 GTexel/s
-
-
-
99.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
572.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
23.84 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
55W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

G96
GPU Name
GK107
NB9P-GLM
GPU Variant
N14P-Q3-A2
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy