Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700M and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
480 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700M
0.099 TFLOPS
Tesla C2090 +1245%
1.332 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2008
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
16
32
Shading Units
512
16
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
-
-
-
99.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

G96
GPU Name
GF110
NB9P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
3 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
2.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy