Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800 and 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1550 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (59W vs 600W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
16320 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1800
0.176 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max 1550 +29689%
52.43 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro FX
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

768MB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
192bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
38.40GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
-
64
Shading Units
16384
32
TMUs
1024
12
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1024
-
RT Cores
128
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
48 KB
L2 Cache
408 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1638 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
52.43 TFLOPS
176.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.43 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
52.43 TFLOPS

Board Design

59W
TDP
600W
250 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

G94
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
G94 GL-U
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
65 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
100 billion
240 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy