Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800M and 12GB VRAM Quadro K6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Quadro K6000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock902MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
2808 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1800M
0.162 TFLOPS
Quadro K6000 +3107%
5.196 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2009
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
797 MHz
-
Boost Clock
902 MHz
550 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
35.20GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
9
SM Count
-
72
Shading Units
2880
24
TMUs
240
8
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.488 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.12 GPixel/s
13.46 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.5 GTexel/s
-
-
-
162.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.196 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1.732 TFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT215
GPU Name
GK110B
N10P-GLM4
GPU Variant
GK110-890-B1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.2
CUDA
3.5
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy