Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800M and 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 260W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
4536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1800M
0.162 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 6000 +9967%
16.31 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2009
Release Date
Aug 2018
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1440 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
550 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
35.20GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
9
SM Count
72
72
Shading Units
4608
24
TMUs
288
8
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.488 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
169.9 GPixel/s
13.46 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
509.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
32.62 TFLOPS
162.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.31 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
509.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
260W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT215
GPU Name
TU102
N10P-GLM4
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy