Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800M and 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
1976 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 45W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1800M
0.162 TFLOPS
RTX A500 Embedded +3275%
5.468 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2009
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
435 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
550 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
35.20GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
9
SM Count
16
72
Shading Units
2048
24
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.488 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.72 GPixel/s
13.46 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
85.44 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.468 TFLOPS
162.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.468 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
85.44 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
20W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT215
GPU Name
GA107S
N10P-GLM4
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.6
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy