Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M vs NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M vs NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800M and 32GB VRAM Tesla PG500 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
5048 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1800M
0.162 TFLOPS
Tesla PG500 216 +8622%
14.13 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2009
Release Date
Nov 2019
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1260 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
550 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
35.20GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
9
SM Count
80
72
Shading Units
5120
24
TMUs
320
8
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.488 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
176.6 GPixel/s
13.46 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
441.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.26 TFLOPS
162.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.13 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
7.066 TFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT215
GPU Name
GV100
N10P-GLM4
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.727 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
7.0
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy