Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M vs NVIDIA Quadro GP100

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M vs NVIDIA Quadro GP100

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 2800M and 16GB VRAM Quadro GP100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 235W)
NVIDIA Quadro GP100 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1442MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (732.2GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3488 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 2800M
0.288 TFLOPS
Quadro GP100 +3490%
10.34 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2009
Release Date
Oct 2016
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1304 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1442 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
715 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
732.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
12
SM Count
56
96
Shading Units
3584
48
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
24 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.4 GPixel/s
28.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
323.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.67 TFLOPS
288.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.34 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
5.168 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
235W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
GP100
N10E-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
15.3 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
610 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
6.0
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy