Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M vs AMD Radeon PRO W7900

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M vs AMD Radeon PRO W7900

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 2800M and 48GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 295W)
AMD Radeon PRO W7900 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2495MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
6048 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 2800M
0.288 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7900 +21191%
61.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2009
Release Date
Apr 2023
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1855 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2495 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
864.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
96
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
6144
48
TMUs
384
16
ROPs
192
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
96
-
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
64 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
96 MB

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
479.0 GPixel/s
28.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
958.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
122.6 TFLOPS
288.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
61.32 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1.916 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
295W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
Navi 31
N10E-GLM
GPU Variant
Navi 31
Tesla
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy