Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000D

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000D

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3600M and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.14GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro 2000D 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (62W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3600M
0.16 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000D +200%
0.48 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Oct 2011
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
799 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.14GB/s
Bandwidth
41.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
4
64
Shading Units
192
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
16.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
160.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
40.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
62W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
GF106
NB8E-GLM3
GPU Variant
GF106-875-KA-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
2.1
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy