Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3600M and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1098MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3600M
0.16 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000M +778%
1.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Dec 2015
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1029 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
799 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.14GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
-
64
Shading Units
640
32
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.57 GPixel/s
16.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.92 GTexel/s
-
-
-
160.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1405 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
43.92 GFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
55W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
GM107
NB8E-GLM3
GPU Variant
N16P-Q3-A2
Tesla
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
5.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy