Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3600M and 6GB VRAM Quadro P3000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
1216 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3600M
0.16 TFLOPS
Quadro P3000 Mobile +1843%
3.11 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Jan 2017
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1088 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
799 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
51.14GB/s
Bandwidth
168.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
10
64
Shading Units
1280
32
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
58.32 GPixel/s
16.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
48.60 GFLOPS
160.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.110 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
97.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
GP104
NB8E-GLM3
GPU Variant
N17E-Q1-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy