Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3600M and 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock1537MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
1984 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3600M
0.16 TFLOPS
RTX A500 Mobile +3835%
6.296 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
832 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1537 MHz
799 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
51.14GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
16
64
Shading Units
2048
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
73.78 GPixel/s
16.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
98.37 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.296 TFLOPS
160.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.296 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
98.37 GFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
GA107S
NB8E-GLM3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
Unknown
324 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy