Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3600M and 16GB VRAM Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1597MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
5056 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3600M
0.16 TFLOPS
Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB +10118%
16.35 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Nov 2019
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1245 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1597 MHz
799 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
51.14GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
80
64
Shading Units
5120
32
TMUs
320
16
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
204.4 GPixel/s
16.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
511.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
32.71 TFLOPS
160.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.35 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
8.177 TFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
GV100
NB8E-GLM3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.0
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy