CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3600M and 16GB VRAM Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1597MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
5056 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3600M
0.16 TFLOPS
Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
+10118%
16.35 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3600M
VS
Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
Graphics Card
Feb 2008
Release Date
Nov 2019
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1245 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1597 MHz
799 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
51.14GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s
Render Config
8
SM Count
80
-
Compute Units
-
64
Shading Units
5120
32
TMUs
320
16
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
Theoretical Performance
8.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
204.4 GPixel/s
16.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
511.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
32.71 TFLOPS
160.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.35 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
8.177 TFLOPS
Graphics Processor
G92
GPU Name
GV100
NB8E-GLM3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²
Board Design
70W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.0
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
2
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs NVIDIA GRID M60 2Q
3
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000M
4
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs NVIDIA Tesla K8
5
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile
6
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000
7
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs NVIDIA Quadro M600M
8
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs NVIDIA Quadro P500 Mobile
9
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin 64 GB
10
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy