CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 370 LP and 32GB VRAM Tesla PG503 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 's Advantages
Released 11 years late
Boost Clock1530MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
5112 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 370 LP
0.017 TFLOPS
Tesla PG503 216
+92076%
15.67 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 370 LP
VS
Tesla PG503 216
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Nov 2019
Quadro FX
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1312 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1530 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
32GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
8.000GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
1
SM Count
80
8
Shading Units
5120
4
TMUs
320
4
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
195.8 GPixel/s
2.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
489.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.33 TFLOPS
17.28 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.67 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
7.834 TFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G98
GPU Name
GV100
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.0
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile
2
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile
3
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420
4
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs NVIDIA GRID K200
5
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs NVIDIA Quadro 7000
6
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x1
7
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380
8
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M
9
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
10
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
Related News
1
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
2
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
3
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
4
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
5
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
6
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
7
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
8
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
9
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
10
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy