Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 370 LP and 32GB VRAM Tesla PG503 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 's Advantages
Released 11 years late
Boost Clock1530MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
5112 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 370 LP
0.017 TFLOPS
Tesla PG503 216 +92076%
15.67 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Nov 2019
Quadro FX
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1312 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1530 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
32GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
8.000GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
80
8
Shading Units
5120
4
TMUs
320
4
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
195.8 GPixel/s
2.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
489.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.33 TFLOPS
17.28 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.67 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
7.834 TFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
GV100
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.0
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy