CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 vs Intel Arctic Sound M
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 vs Intel Arctic Sound M
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
Intel Arctic Sound M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700 and 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (78W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 14 years late
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
8080 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3700
0.28 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M
+5167%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3700
VS
Intel Arctic Sound M
Graphics Card
Jan 2008
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
112
Shading Units
8192
56
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
28.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
280.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS
Board Design
78W
TDP
500W
250 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
G92
GPU Name
DG2-512
G92-875-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M
2
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000
3
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
4
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600
5
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x1
6
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max Q
7
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
8
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 vs NVIDIA Quadro P600
9
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290
10
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 DGXS 32 GB
Related News
1
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
2
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
3
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
4
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
5
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
6
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
7
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
8
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
9
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
10
Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy