Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP vs NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP vs NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 LP and 80GB VRAM A100 PCIe 80 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (28W vs 300W)
NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (80GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.94TB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
6896 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380 LP
0.044 TFLOPS
A100 PCIe 80 GB +44195%
19.49 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2009
Release Date
Jun 2021
Quadro FX
Generation
Tesla Ampere(Axx)
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1512 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
80GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
5120bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
1.94TB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
108
16
Shading Units
6912
8
TMUs
432
4
ROPs
160
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
80 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
225.6 GPixel/s
4.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
609.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
77.97 TFLOPS
44.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.49 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
9.746 TFLOPS

Board Design

28W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
GA100
GT218 GL
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
8.0
4.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy