Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP vs NVIDIA GRID K520

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP vs NVIDIA GRID K520

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 LP and 4GB VRAM GRID K520 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (28W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K520 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1520 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380 LP
0.044 TFLOPS
GRID K520 +5102%
2.289 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2009
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro FX
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
1536
8
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
4.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
-
-
44.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS

Board Design

28W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
GK104
GT218 GL
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.2
CUDA
3.0
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy