Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 LP and 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (28W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
More VRAM (5GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (140.2GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1008 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380 LP
0.044 TFLOPS
Quadro P2000 +6788%
3.031 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2009
Release Date
Feb 2017
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1076 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
160bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
140.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
8
16
Shading Units
1024
8
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.20 GPixel/s
4.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
94.72 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
47.36 GFLOPS
44.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.031 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
94.72 GFLOPS

Board Design

28W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
GP106
GT218 GL
GPU Variant
GP106-875-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
6.1
4.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy