Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 LP and 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (28W vs 80W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1904 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380 LP
0.044 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile +11943%
5.299 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2009
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
945 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
30
16
Shading Units
1920
8
TMUs
120
4
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
30
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
88.32 GPixel/s
4.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
165.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.60 TFLOPS
44.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.299 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
165.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

28W
TDP
80W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
TU106
GT218 GL
GPU Variant
N19E-Q1-KA-K1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy