Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP vs NVIDIA RTX A2000

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP vs NVIDIA RTX A2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 LP and 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (28W vs 70W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
3312 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380 LP
0.044 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 +18052%
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2009
Release Date
Aug 2021
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
562 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
26
16
Shading Units
3328
8
TMUs
104
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
104
-
RT Cores
26
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
4.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
44.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
124.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

28W
TDP
70W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
GA106
GT218 GL
GPU Variant
GA106-850-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
12 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.6
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy